Scientific basis
What does science say?
This is not our opinion. Dopamine after a win, cortisol after a loss — both weaken the prefrontal cortex and hand control over to reflex. The studies below prove every thesis.
| Source | Year | Title — original / translation | Key findings and baseline numbers |
|---|---|---|---|
Daniel Kahneman & Amos TverskyPsychologists (Hebrew University / Stanford) | 1979 | Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk (Econometrica)Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk |
Base: Experiment — hundreds of survey participants (hypothetical decision problems). Nobel Prize, 2002. |
Brad Barber & Terrance OdeanFinance professors, University of California (UC) | 2000 | Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth (Journal of Finance)Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth |
Base: ~66,000 private accounts, 1991–1996. Most active 20%: ~11.4% net annual return; market: ~17.9%. |
Wolfram Schultz, Peter Dayan & Read MontagueNeurophysiologists (Cambridge / UCL) | 1997 | A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward (Science)A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward |
Base: Single-neuron recordings in primates (laboratory neurophysiology). |
Amy ArnstenNeurobiologist, Yale University (Yale) | 2009 | Stress Signalling Pathways That Impair Prefrontal Cortex (Nature Reviews Neuroscience)Stress Signalling Pathways That Impair Prefrontal Cortex |
Base: A synthesis of dozens of studies (review article) — not a single sample. |
John Coates & Joe HerbertUniversity of Cambridge (neurophysiology) | 2008 | Endogenous Steroids and Financial Risk Taking on a London Trading Floor (PNAS)Endogenous Steroids and Financial Risk Taking on a London Trading Floor |
Base: 17 male traders, over 8 working days (City of London). |
Camelia Kuhnen & Brian KnutsonStanford University (neuroeconomics) | 2005 | The Neural Basis of Financial Risk Taking (Neuron)The Neural Basis of Financial Risk Taking |
Base: fMRI laboratory experiment (a small group of participants). |
Terrance OdeanFinance professor, University of California (UC) | 1998 | Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? (Journal of Finance)Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses? |
Base: ~10,000 retail brokerage accounts. |
F. Chague, R. De-Losso & B. GiovannettiUniversity of São Paulo (USP), Brazil | 2020 | Day Trading for a Living?Day Trading for a Living? |
Base: 19,600 day traders, 2013–2015. 97% loss · 1.1% more than the minimum wage. |
Barber, Lee, Liu & OdeanUniversities of California and Taiwan | 2014 | The Cross-Section of Speculator Skill: Evidence from Day TradingThe Cross-Section of Speculator Skill: Evidence from Day Trading |
Base: Taiwan's entire day-trader population, 15 years (1992–2006). |
Andrew Lo, Dmitry Repin & Brett SteenbargerMIT and clinical psychology | 2005 | Fear and Greed in Financial Markets: A Clinical Study of Day-TradersFear and Greed in Financial Markets: A Clinical Study of Day-Traders |
Base: A clinical observational study on day traders (a small group). |
Hersh Shefrin & Meir StatmanSanta Clara University (finance) | 1985 | The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long (Journal of Finance)The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long |
Base: A theoretical framework + confirmation with market data. |
Vijayraghavan et al.Arnsten Lab, Yale University | 2007 | Inverted-U Dopamine D1 Receptor Actions on Prefrontal Neurons (Nature Neuroscience)Inverted-U Dopamine D1 Receptor Actions on Prefrontal Neurons |
Base: Neurophysiological experiment in primates (laboratory). |
Brad Barber & Terrance OdeanFinance professors, University of California (UC) | 2001 | Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment (Quarterly Journal of Economics)Boys Will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment |
Base: ~35,000 private accounts, 1991–1997. |
Brett N. SteenbargerClinical psychologist, SUNY Upstate Medical University | 2003–15 | The Psychology of Trading · Trading Psychology 2.0The Psychology of Trading · Trading Psychology 2.0 |
Base: Many years of clinical practice with traders (no exact percentage cited). |
The sources are recognized, peer-reviewed works in the field. Neurophysiological studies reveal the mechanism (laboratory, small sample); trading studies prove the result (tens of thousands of real accounts). The loss figure is consistently presented as 70–90% (up to 97% in some markets).